<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: what type of analysis to be use for this?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.surveystime.com/customer-satisfaction-survey/what-type-of-analysis-to-be-use-for-this/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.surveystime.com/customer-satisfaction-survey/what-type-of-analysis-to-be-use-for-this</link>
	<description>Employee Satisfaction Surveys</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2011 19:02:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mathsmanretired</title>
		<link>http://www.surveystime.com/customer-satisfaction-survey/what-type-of-analysis-to-be-use-for-this/comment-page-1#comment-1114</link>
		<dc:creator>mathsmanretired</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jul 2010 09:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.surveystime.com/customer-satisfaction-survey/what-type-of-analysis-to-be-use-for-this#comment-1114</guid>
		<description>If you have several different services all rated in this way then a Chi-squared contingency table would be appropriate but not with only ten pieces of data for each one. This is because all of the entries in the expected frequencies grid should be at least 5 for worthwhile reliability.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you have several different services all rated in this way then a Chi-squared contingency table would be appropriate but not with only ten pieces of data for each one. This is because all of the entries in the expected frequencies grid should be at least 5 for worthwhile reliability.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

